[et_pb_section fb_built=\u00a0\u00bb1″ theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb specialty=\u00a0\u00bbon\u00a0\u00bb _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb custom_padding=\u00a0\u00bb||1px|||\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_column type=\u00a0\u00bb1_2″ specialty_columns=\u00a0\u00bb2″ theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_row_inner _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type=\u00a0\u00bb1_2″ _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″]<\/p>\n
Le contexte :<\/strong> une consultante cadre, embauch\u00e9e en CDI par Altran Technologies en 2018, est licenci\u00e9e le 6 juillet 2022 pour faute simple. L’entreprise lui reproche deux griefs : avoir pris des cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s sans autorisation pr\u00e9alable de sa hi\u00e9rarchie, et avoir organis\u00e9 du t\u00e9l\u00e9travail depuis l’\u00e9tranger sans accord de l’employeur.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″]<\/p>\n Ce que le Conseil a constat\u00e9 : <\/strong>Sur le premier grief, le Conseil rel\u00e8ve que le bulletin de salaire du mois d’ao\u00fbt 2022, \u00e9tabli par Altran elle-m\u00eame, mentionne express\u00e9ment l’octroi de deux jours de cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s aux dates exactes vis\u00e9es par la lettre de licenciement. L’employeur avait donc valid\u00e9 les cong\u00e9s qu’il reprochait ensuite \u00e0 la salari\u00e9e d’avoir pris. L’accusation d’insubordination est jug\u00e9e d\u00e9pourvue de fondement s\u00e9rieux.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=\u00a0\u00bb1_2″ theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_image src=\u00a0\u00bbhttps:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Sud-gagne-au-CPH-cp2.jpg\u00a0\u00bb _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb title_text=\u00a0\u00bbSud gagne au CPH cp2″ hover_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″][\/et_pb_image][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=\u00a0\u00bb1″ theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb custom_padding=\u00a0\u00bb1px||4px|||\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_row _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_column _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb type=\u00a0\u00bb4_4″ theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″]<\/p>\n Sur le second grief, le Conseil constate qu’aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment concret du dossier ne d\u00e9montre que la salari\u00e9e se serait effectivement connect\u00e9e au r\u00e9seau interne de l’entreprise depuis un lieu de vill\u00e9giature, ni qu’elle aurait accompli des t\u00e2ches professionnelles depuis l’\u00e9tranger. En l’absence de preuve mat\u00e9rielle, ce grief ne peut pas davantage \u00eatre retenu.<\/p>\n Sur le pr\u00e9avis :<\/strong> la salari\u00e9e ayant pos\u00e9 des cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s pendant sa p\u00e9riode de pr\u00e9avis, celui-ci aurait d\u00fb \u00eatre prorog\u00e9 d’un mois. Altran ne l’a pas fait. Le Conseil accorde un compl\u00e9ment d’indemnit\u00e9 compensatrice de pr\u00e9avis ainsi que les cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s incidents correspondants.<\/p>\n Sur les demandes rejet\u00e9es :<\/strong> la salari\u00e9e r\u00e9clamait \u00e9galement une indemnit\u00e9 au titre d’une augmentation de r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration qui lui aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 promise. Le Conseil constate qu’aucun engagement clair, irr\u00e9vocable et portant sur un montant pr\u00e9cis n’a \u00e9t\u00e9 pris par Altran. Cette demande est rejet\u00e9e, de m\u00eame que les demandes fond\u00e9es sur la r\u00e9sistance abusive et la perte de chance qui reposaient sur les m\u00eames fondements.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=\u00a0\u00bb1″ theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb specialty=\u00a0\u00bbon\u00a0\u00bb _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb custom_padding=\u00a0\u00bb9px||0px|||\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_column type=\u00a0\u00bb1_2″ theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_image src=\u00a0\u00bbhttps:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Sud-gagne-au-CPH-cp.jpg\u00a0\u00bb _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb title_text=\u00a0\u00bbSud gagne au CPH cp\u00a0\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″ custom_margin=\u00a0\u00bb55px|||||\u00a0\u00bb][\/et_pb_image][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=\u00a0\u00bb1_2″ specialty_columns=\u00a0\u00bb2″ theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_row_inner _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type=\u00a0\u00bb1_2″ _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″]<\/p>\n Ce que le Conseil a prononc\u00e9 :<\/strong><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=\u00a0\u00bb1″ theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb custom_padding=\u00a0\u00bb4px|||||\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_row _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_column _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb type=\u00a0\u00bb4_4″ theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00a0\u00bb4.27.5″ _module_preset=\u00a0\u00bbdefault\u00a0\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00a0\u00bbpost_content\u00a0\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00a0\u00bb0″]<\/p>\n Total des condamnations : 14 956,20 EUR + int\u00e9r\u00eats l\u00e9gaux + astreinte.<\/strong><\/p>\n Ce que cette d\u00e9cision d\u00e9montre :<\/strong> Altran a licenci\u00e9 une salari\u00e9e pour des faits qu’elle avait elle-m\u00eame autoris\u00e9s, sans apporter la moindre preuve mat\u00e9rielle du second grief invoqu\u00e9. Le Conseil a m\u00e9thodiquement d\u00e9truit chaque motif. Cette victoire a \u00e9t\u00e9 obtenue sans avocat, par un d\u00e9fenseur syndical de SUD Industrie, face au cabinet d’avocats d’Altran (barreau de Paris).<\/p>\n SUD Industrie Capgemini \/ Altran – D\u00e9fense des salari\u00e9s<\/em><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Le contexte : une consultante cadre, embauch\u00e9e en CDI par Altran Technologies en 2018, est licenci\u00e9e le 6 juillet 2022 pour faute simple. L’entreprise lui reproche deux griefs : avoir pris des cong\u00e9s pay\u00e9s sans autorisation pr\u00e9alable de sa hi\u00e9rarchie, et avoir organis\u00e9 du t\u00e9l\u00e9travail depuis l’\u00e9tranger sans accord de l’employeur.Ce que le Conseil a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2540,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[89,122],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2539","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-a-la-une","category-licenciements","et-has-post-format-content","et_post_format-et-post-format-standard"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2539","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2539"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2539\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2545,"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2539\/revisions\/2545"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2540"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sud-industrie-capgemini.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n